A Meeting of Giants

Imagine that you argon a histrion in a panel interchange with Sigmund Freud, Carl Rogers, Albert Bandura, and Albert Ellis.The discussion is facilitated by a moderator who asks questions for each of you to answer match to your different theories of personality development and change. How would you and each of the opposite four panel members answer the amounting questions? (Note pee-pee the answers for the early(a) panel members based on your judgement of their theories. Your own answers will reflect your personal opinions and beliefs, and may include bits and pieces of other theories).The panel was fin every last(predicate) in ally assembled on that wet cold day in December. I was feeling a bit sheepish to be in the comp whatever of such great scholars. Sigmund Freud, Carl Rogers, Albert Bandura, and Albert Ellis were decent powerful company for me to lock wits with. However, I believed that my opinion was just as important and pat as there own. I was just ambit for my water glass when the moderator called us to order and perplex immediately with the first question.Question 1How would you explain the differences in persons regarding their reactions to leave? Why do some persons bulge out to fol small-scale all the rules of others, while other persons appear figure on living by their own sets of rules?Dr. FreudThe military personnel being is essentially a sophisticated force system. That energy is channeled, flows, or is blocked by a number or different behaviors. The goal of all these behaviors is of course joy. Energy will always bring forth the path of least jibance that trines to pleasure.When this energy is encumber or rerouted by social demands, such as rules and taboos, that energy must be vented in some way. Some one-on-ones atomic number 18 more(prenominal) than given(predicate) at releasing this energy in a positive manner, while others are more throw by it.Some individuals forfeit there pursuit of pleasure and lead guilt ridden and often miserable subsists although they appear to be socially tame. Others allow their natural longing to pursue pleasure to guide their lives and are unremarkably much happier, although society may feel they are living by their own rules.Dr. RogersI pray to disagree with what my colleague Dr. Freud has stated. His theories are often grow in sexual baffles and motivations. However, the greatest human drive is the single goal towards self-actualization. It is not necessary to contest on which particular pleasure principle an individual is undertakeing to understand why they buck dominance.Those individuals that resist berth have simply grown from a less complex being into a more complex one. The less complex we are, the more government agency we may feel we need.As an individual matures and develops, they become more complex and may opinek to break the draw of authority for a greater life experience. Those who go along with the status quo perhaps see their liv es in the light that they have achieved what they can and there is no need to push further. We all simply seek to maintain and improve who we believe we are and the live experience in general. (Pervin, Cervon, & Oliver, 2005)Dr. BanduraSelf- readiness has a great change in self-development, perseverance in the face of resistance, resiliency to trauma, and decision choices at crucial junctures in life. The rejection of authority is no greater than it is seen among adolescents and young adults.The ability to swan and regulate self-efficacy is core to the ability to self-manage ones motivations, desires, and responses. Beliefs of personal efficacy are what case an individual to adopt certain(prenominal) self regulatory standards (Bandura, Caprara, Barbaranelli, Gerbino, & Pastorelli, 2003) If a person believes that they are useful in society they are sharp to be more law abiding and compliant of authority (Bandura et al., 2003). When other individuals feel as if their self-worth is low they are less likely to respect authority and will live as they see cope with because of their standing in society. (Pervin et al., 2005)Dr. EllisSelf-evaluation leads to depression and repression, and avoidance of change. The surmount thing for human health is that we should stop evaluating ourselves altogether. in that respect is often concern for individuals because of their self image and societal pressures.These two are more likely to be in agreement than in conflict. The key is to see behaviors for what they are. Is there anyone who likes authority? Of course not we all have some disagreement with being told what to do by someone else. However true this may be it is not the authority that causes problems for most individuals it is the blind beliefs that adherence or rejection of this authority will lead to some dire consequence.This in itself may cause individuals to have one reaction or the other to the rule makers. Some may choose count compliance in hopes that l ife remains stable, or what appears to be total anarchy and disrespect for any authority because it has no affect.